[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: (retry) Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?

  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>
  • To: Oren Ben-Kiki <oren@c...>, xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 12:16:27 -0000

sml
> It isn't yet clear that SSLT is viable, even assuming SML is.

>From the XML.com article:
"Since a Simple Markup Language is already a reality in many applications,
there is some urgency to setting the standard in place. Such a standard is
not
likely to be difficult to define, nor is there good reason for it to be
particularly controversial, so it should not take long for it to appear.
Expect to see the draft no later than mid-December and a standard by
January."
http://www.xml.com/pub/1999/11/sml/index.html

Until I read that, I thought SML was (largely) a research exercise on
Don's part - and we were all waiting to see whether he'd have to
eat the spec for breakfast or not. Will it or won't it fly. The
above quote suggests that it will, and that its actually going
to be a standard.

> We might settle on simply using XSLT on SML input.

> There's no reason we _must_ write the stylesheets in SML.

This is the nub of my confusion - if SML is for palmtops
or other devices, then we must write the stylesheets
in SML because such devices apparently can't cope with
an XML parser (and certainly not an XML parser for XSLT processing,
and an SML parser for the rest).

But then we're still not entirely sure where (or if) SML is going to
be deployed.

> Other XML specs don't have this option. How would one handle XLink in SML?

And what about XPath - the attribute related syntax might be redundant
if that removed from SML, so we can start simplifying there too, right?

I'm not knocking the SML effort per se, just trying to get a feel
for the scope of the endeavour. Its also hard to judge its progress
because there are no use-cases, milestones or requirements to
judge it against.

There are multiple definitions of 'simple'. Which one, specifically,
is SML working towards? Don suggested "minimal, and easy"
http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/xml-dev-Nov-1999/1163.html
Can we quantify that further - or will that happen when
the grammar has been finalised?

Cheers,

L.

p.s. Egg/face interface ready, as is my flame-proof jacket :). I'm
really just curious...


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)



PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.