RE: Feeling good about SML
>I think it would be a sad mistake for people to think that XML's >internationalization is there merely to provide extra markets for >bloated monopolies, though with luck it may. For some of us, >the major benefit in XML is that provides a clear toolkit by which >much of the mess of the 70s and 80s can be cleaned up; removing >internationalization from XML does not give Simple Markup >Language, but Uncle Sam Markup Language. I was born in Korea so I appreciate your position. However, your opposition of SML is based on the assumption that SML will only support UTF-8. The list of SML features is preliminary and, personally, I do not mind seeing SML support both UTF-8 and UTF-16 although not necessarily at the same time since the application might require either encoding but not both. >This is why I feel bad about SML. Please don't derail XML. First of all, I do not believe there is any danger of XML being derailed. Second, is it not true that XML derailed SGML? Best, Don Park - mailto:donpark@d... Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format