[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: A Plea for Schemas

• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 02 Nov 1999 00:07:41 -0600

Tim Bray wrote:
> 
> At 07:43 PM 11/1/99 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
> >My customers rarely ask about schemas -- they're a lot more worried
> >about transfer protocols and digital signatures.

My customers and students are old-fashioned in comparison.

> And when my customers *do* ask about schemas I start to get nervous,
> as it is often a symptom of starry-eyed hope that when they write the
> schema they've cracked the nut, and somehow "XML will do the rest."

"To me programming is more than an important practical art. It is 
 also a gigantic undertaking in the foundations of knowledge."
         - Grace Hopper

By the time you have a schema for your domain you have mapped out your
communal understanding of that domain. In many areas that *is* cracking
the nut. As a practical example, consider word processing. By now there
are dozens of word processors and desktop publishers. It would be a
massive effort to come to understand their commonalities and define the
"universal DTP language."

 Paul Prescod

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: A Plea for Schemas
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Undeclared namespace
• Next by Date: Re: A Plea for Schemas
• Previous by thread: Re: A Plea for Schemas
• Next by thread: Re: A Plea for Schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread