[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: WML vs. XHTML

• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: <jelks@j...>,<xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 09:25:58 -0500

At 12:37 AM 11/8/99 -0500, Jelks Cabaniss wrote:

>What do *you* think of Rohit Khare's comments about the WAP Forum?[1]  And it
>would be interesting to know how Phone.com (formerly "Unwired Planet") has
>responded to that article (if indeed they have responded) ...

One consultant's opinion, which is now rather dated, viewed in Web time. 

The "conclusions" regarding XHTML are suspect. 

Quite frankly, much of it sounds like some of the more paranoid rantings
here :)

Ann
---

Author of:  Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
10/99 - Mastering XML, 12/99 - HTML By Example, 2nd. Ed.

Founder, WebGeek Communications            http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
Director, HWG Online Education             http://www.hwg.org/services/classes





xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: WML vs. XHTML
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • RE: WML vs. XHTML
    • From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: WML vs. XHTML
• Next by Date: Re: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Previous by thread: Re: WML vs. XHTML
• Next by thread: New Technology Nursery for MT'99/XML'99
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread