[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Re: SGML, XML and SML

• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 15:27:35 -0800

>Don, do you think SML would be a good medium for then sending chunks of
>SVG  - have to keep the attributes, though. This way 'web browsers, etc
>can send/receive SML or XML fragments to update the display - obviously
>actual pixel resolution is important now, but for how much longer?

Yes.  Pixel resolution will be more important in the future.  Next X-mas.

Best,

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: Why I Hate Palmtops (was: Re: SGML, XML and SML)
• Next by Date: RE: RDF, again
• Previous by thread: Re: SGML, XML and SML
• Next by thread: Funny things about XML gizmos
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread