Re: scripts and XHTML
At 02:58 PM 10/15/99 -0400, Thomas B. Passin wrote: >The convention is used for old browsers that don't understand <script>. These >won't understand XHTML either, so (IMO) there's no real need for the <script> >convention in HTML. For the most part, actually, older browsers do just fine with XHTML - probably better in many ways than they do with HTML. How HTML compatible do you want your XHTML? Is the convention included by reference to HTML 4.01, or does it disappear? Older browsers will of course choke on the CDATA section, unless of course that goes into the commented section as well... Simon St.Laurent XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. Building XML Applications Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies http://www.simonstl.com xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format