[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Another look at namespaces

• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• To: XML-DEV <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:35:08 +0200

Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> 
> It seems clear that the HTML team have some mental concept of namespaces
> which exists independently of  what the W3C specification actually
> allows.

I think that you are putting the blame in the wrong place. A quick
perusal of this forum suggests that the namespace editors disagree on
what the namespace specification "really means". It seems to me that the
specification has proven too general, too flexible and has been shown to
depend too much on mystical shared understanding of a "reasonable
namespace" that turns out not to be shared.

> If a W3C specs  can be utterly overturned in such a way, what is their
> value?

There is nothing in the HTML specification that violates the text of the
XML namespaces specification. If you are going to say that it violates
the "spirit" of the specification then we are back where we started.

 Paul Prescod

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Another look at namespaces
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Another look at namespaces
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Binary-encoding of XML for communication
• Next by Date: Re: More than three namespaces for XHTML? (was Re: What XHTML should do with namespaces)
• Previous by thread: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread