[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

HTML namespace (was: an unfilled need)

• From: David LeBlanc <whisper@a...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 10:39:53 -0700

At 08:54 AM 9/6/99 -0700, Tim Bray wrote:
>Dammit, if the W3C obstinately refuses to give HTML a name for
>programmers to hang their hats on, I'm going to start a campaign right
>here in xml-dev for *us* to pick something, it'll be easier than 
>designing SAX. -Tim
>
Hmm.. how about something after C++: Any tag which does not have a
namespace prefix or is not recognizably within a namespace is implicitly
HTML. Any tag which is not prefixed or not contained within a namespace and
is not defined by the version of HTML in use is an error.

When I first wrote this I thought it didn't answer the problem posed by
Tim, but then I realized that it does: if you don't have a doc header, you
don't have an HTML document thus you don't have tags which are prefixed or
within a namespace and thus the whole document is an error.

This, of course, is going to fly merrily down the runway and smack into a
wall consisting of all those pages out there that either don't use a doc
header or don't use it correctly (as was pointed out by a nearby post about
IBM's usage). 

Excuse me if I really did miss your point Tim.

Dave LeBlanc

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: an unfilled need
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Crazy idea
• Next by Date: Re: Crazy idea
• Previous by thread: MSFT is innocent, this time (was Re: an unfilled need)
• Next by thread: Re: an unfilled need
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread