[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XHTML & Schemas

• From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• To: "Paul Prescod" <paul@p...>, "xml-dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 09:29:00 +0800

----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
> Namespaces are triggers for various things. Stylesheets, validators,
> etc.

Up until I changed my mind about this premise, I agreed completely with both
your three-namespace conclusion and your actual argument for it.

However, I no longer agree with the premise above as stated. Namespaces are
for distinguishing element/attribute vocabularies within an instance. Any
other use of them is beyond the spec and bound to end up in arguments on
xml-dev :-)

A corollary to this is that *something else* (perhaps in conjunction with
namespaces) must trigger stylesheets, validators, etc. I would like to see a
solution proposed for that---soon, if at all possible.

James
--
James Tauber / jtauber@j... / www.jtauber.com
Maintainer of : www.xmlinfo.com,  www.xmlsoftware.com and www.schema.net
<pipe>Ceci n'est pas une pipe</pipe>



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XHTML & Schemas
    • From: Walter Underwood <wunder@i...>
  • Re: XHTML & Schemas
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • XHTML & Schemas
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Next by Date: Re: How about over 1,000,000 XHTML Namespace URIs?
• Previous by thread: XHTML & Schemas
• Next by thread: Re: XHTML & Schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread