[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC

• From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 16:57:39 +0100

> Yet, depending on the application that's processing the
> information, the location of the physical birth record might very well be
> content.
[snip!]
> Attributes seem to "fossilize" one particular perspective of the
> data, at the expense of alternative ways of looking at the information.

I agree - that was essentially what I was driving at, but probably
less lucidly. :)

The 'metadata' are useful pointers to the processing application.
They're not part of the document content, so shouldn't they be
modelled separately? Either as element content, and make
use of namespaces to clarify their role, or pull 'em out into a
separate document entirely.

L.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC
    • From: Mark Nutter <mnutter@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [MAILER-DAEMON@n...: Returned mail: User unknown]
• Next by Date: Re: XHTML and the Three Namespaces
• Previous by thread: RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC
• Next by thread: Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread