[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Attributes vs. text content (Was Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC)

• From: "joubin" <joubin@i...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 18:39:16 -0400

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>

>But why 'methodName' is also not 'information _about_ the element' is
>not obvious. 

That _is_ a good point.  However, this is someone else's protocol.

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<methodCall type="asynchronous" name="xmlbased.cgi.named.foo">
     // .. etc.
</methodCall>

This would work too, I suppose.

Best Regards,

Joubin
_____________________________________________________________________
member, alpha zero LLC              202.462.1655                   dc



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Announce: Prefs distribution thru XML-RPC
• Next by Date: Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC
• Previous by thread: RE: Attributes vs. text content (Was Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC)
• Next by thread: XHTML and the Three Namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread