[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Another look at namespaces

• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 10:44:20 -0400

At 07:39 AM 9/17/99 -0700, David Brownell wrote:

>Something can't be both optional and definitive in that
>way ... if it's optional, some other way could be be
>at least as correct/definitive.

Yes, it very well could. I don't see them as being mutually exclusive. 

Ann
---

Author of Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
Coming in September --- Mastering XML

Founder, WebGeek Communications            http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
Director, HWG Online Education             http://www.hwg.org/services/classes





xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Another look at namespaces
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Another look at namespaces
    • From: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w...>
  • Re: Another look at namespaces
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Re: Another look at namespaces
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces"
• Next by Date: A compromise?
• Previous by thread: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread