[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Another look at namespaces

• From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• To: 'XML-DEV' <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 15:01:07 +0200

David Megginson wrote:
> 
> 
> I cannot remember Tim Bray's exact wording, but he said something like
> "programs can use qualified names they recognize as triggers for
> processing behaviour".  That (or whatever he actually said) is the
> best summary of Namespaces that's come out so far.

Perhaps his exact wording is to be preferred. The stated summary conflates the
identity of the name with the mechanism used to ensure and/or establish that
identity.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Another look at namespaces
    • From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
  • RE: Another look at namespaces
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
  • RE: Another look at namespaces
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look atnamespaces"
• Next by Date: Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces"
• Previous by thread: RE: Another look at namespaces
• Next by thread: RE: Another look at namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread