[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

re: an unfilled need

• From: Arjun Ray <aray@q...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 03:14:56 -0400 (EDT)

On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Ann Navarro wrote:

> In today's Web browser, there is built-in "knowledge" of what HTML
> elements are supposed to be and do. They have been programmed to
> recognize a <P> element as a new structural block, presented with a
> leading line space, text flush left, unless otherwise indicated in a
> style sheet or align attribute.

Well, this isn't really true.  The popular browsers are inheritors of the
Mosaic paradigm, which starts with an inherently different view of tags to
begin with - as isolated (or "streamed") embedded commands; the concept of
"element" doesn't pertain at all.  Consider, for instance, this elaborate
non-explanation of why </P> should make a difference:

 <URL:http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/1998May/0101.html>

(This is also why, IMHO, stylesheets never had a chance with these
browsers.) 

> Simple, primarily presentation information, but it's preprogrammed in 
> how to deal with such elements.  [...] Allowing for discovery, based
> on a schema, DTD, or whatever other defining mechanism is provided,
> lets tomorrow's Web browser have that same "knowledge" of a <foo>
> element, 

How?  Either tomorrow's browser has the preprogramming, or it doesn't.


Arjun



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • re: an unfilled need
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML
• Next by Date: XML belongs to itself. (Re: an unfilled need)
• Previous by thread: Re: an unfilled need
• Next by thread: Re: an unfilled need
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread