Re: CNET on XHTML
"Hunter, David" wrote: > > From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:Daniel.Veillard@w...] > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 5:14 AM > > <snip/> > > I guess Ann > > and other members of that working group did explain the reasons of > > their technical decision. > <snip/> > > Let me just echo Simon St. Laurent: > > No. We have no reason. We have nothing. Aye -- nothing. An "official" W3C rationale is still lacking; odd since this decision seems to fly in the face of the clear intent of the XML namespaces spec. "A html:rose is a strict:rose is a frameset:rose ... " - Dave xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format