[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: confidentiality in W3C WGs

• From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
• To: Matthew Gertner <matthew@p...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 21:16:30 -0500

Matthew Gertner wrote:
> 
> Well, I wonder if the argument for doing it Ye Olde Fashioned Way is
> really as strong as all that. 

Then use the technology invented to do it.  I have presented a challenge 
to Dr Newcomb and Mr. Kimber to show by example what is possible here 
using groves.  Groves are not necessary to achieve it, but they may 
be necessary to sustain what is achieved by putting such documents into 
a form rigorous enough to withstand both time and the changes of power 
and authority.

> Be that as it may, this policy needs revision of some sort. Apart from
> what appears to be overall agreement that the content of and motivation
> behind important decisions should be published more consistently in a
> clear and timely manner, 

Yes.  I think all clear thinking persons on this list can agree.

len


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: confidentiality in W3C WGs
    • From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@s...>
  • Re: confidentiality in W3C WGs
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
  • Re: confidentiality in W3C WGs
    • From: Matthew Gertner <matthew@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ANN: XML and Databases article
• Next by Date: Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation)
• Previous by thread: Re: confidentiality in W3C WGs
• Next by thread: RE: confidentiality in W3C WGs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread