|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XHTML & Schemas
Paul Prescod wrote: > > David Megginson wrote: > > > > > The quoted section 4.1 of the XSchema draft seems to directly > > > contradict his view of what's right, so XML did not "get it > > > right". Am I missing something again? > > > > Yes -- XML-Schema is not XML. XML-Schema is (currently) getting it > > wrong, but they're in the early drafts, so I still hope for their > > redemption. > > I don't know what you are talking about. A schema rule is inherently > triggered based on hooks within the document. What could be a more > natural hook than the universal name for an element type? Any declaration (element, PI, etc) about the schema that the document creator intended to apply! Inferring semantics is typically a lose. An issue is that the schema DRAFT (!) is saying that the namespace REC (!) was wrong -- schema is saying namespaces are for more than disambiguating names, the REC says otherwise. We may have a fully unambiguous notion of who "Henry" is ... but that won't normally be placing limits on where we might run into him! - Dave xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








