Re: groves dissent
On 27 Sep 1999, David Megginson wrote: > Unfortunately, AFs came out with three strikes against them: they were > developed by ISO (yawn!), they were introduced as an appendix to the > very long and intense HyTime spec (awk!), and they weren't very webby > (oops!). They also hit a foul with their convoluted mechanism for > attribute mapping. And they were ejected by the Ump for failing to give C++ programmers warm fuzzy feelings. > I agree with Eliot Kimber and others, though, that eventually XML will > need something like AFs. Then I gotta "disagree"... XML needs something like AFs *now*! Arjun xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format