[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces

• From: Marc.McDonald@D...
• To: xml-dev@i..., ann@w...
• Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:50:19 -0700

> At 07:11 PM 9/24/99 -0700, Marc.McDonald@D... wrote:
> 
> >	XML is supposed to be a content language, not a presentation
> >language. By introducing separate namespaces for the basic different
> >rendering models of XHTML you have made a presentation dependency. 
> 
> No one has asserted, and it is indeed incorrect to say that content model
> =
> presentation. 
> 
> Ann
> 
I'm just noting that some of the differences between XHTML DTDs are
primarily presentation differences, for instance between transitional and
strict. HTML's model is one where, to some extent, presentation and content
are both in the document (for instance color and font specification). 

I'm not saying anyone has said content=presentation, but that some
presentation expression has crept into content.


Marc B. McDonald
Principal Software Scientist

Design Intelligence, Inc.
1111 Third Avenue, Suite 1500
Seattle, WA  98101
marc.mcdonald@d...
Ph: 206.343-7797
Fax: 206.343.7750

http://www.design-intelligence.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Identical production rules
• Next by Date: RE: Attributes and namespaces
• Previous by thread: RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: Attributes vs. text content
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread