|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Another try on groves
Thank you Paul. No disrespect to the more political discussions on XML-DEV, which I appreciate are inspired by deep feelings about serious issues, but I'd just like to say that this post is the kind of informative and enlightening gem that makes it worth plowing through all the traffic. Now that I have some feeling for the rationale behind Groves, I'd be very interested in knowing what this might mean for implementations. Could one come up with a language independent API like the DOM, to which Grove compliant APIs would conform? Presumably there is more complexity in that the DOM has a closed set of underlying object types whereas each Grove interface would would have different underlying object types. In Java terms, would this be an interface (a totally abstract class which guarantees a core functionality in any object which implements it)? Has anyone in fact built CORBA IDL or a Java interface defining the Grove API, or am I coming in at the wrong level? Francis. Paul Prescod wrote: [ a compelling illustration and explanation of Groves ] xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








