Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation)
Simon St.Laurent writes: > In other words, we're stuck, should wait for schemas, and should > discontinue use of DTDs in systems where namespaces may be > important? (And I mean namespaces, not namespace prefixes.) No -- it shouldn't matter whether Namespaces are important or not. You should discontinue using DTDs where you don't care about the specific prefixes used, since you're not buying yourself anything by using them when you don't care about the XML 1.0 layer. All the best, David -- David Megginson david@m... http://www.megginson.com/ xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format