[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: dumb namespaces question

• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: simonstl@s...
• Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 18:35:21 -0400 (EDT)

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:
> 
> The end of section 2 of 'Namespaces in XML' saith:
> >Namespace Constraint: Leading "XML"
> >Prefixes beginning with the three-letter sequence x, m, l, in any case 
> >combination, are reserved for use by XML and XML-related specifications. 
> 
> To me, that means that you can't start your own namespaces using xml or
> whatever.  However, it isn't clear what this means for namespace processing
> with xml:space and xml:lang.  There is no declared namespace for these
> lucky attribute values.

Clause 4 saith:

# The prefix xml is by definition bound to the namespace name
# http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace.

But there is no namespace for xmlns, because that prefix is truly magic.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@c...
       I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • dumb namespaces question
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Next by Date: Re: XHTML & Schemas
• Previous by thread: dumb namespaces question
• Next by thread: Re: dumb namespaces question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread