Ann Navarro wrote: > > I'm arguing that each flavor of XHTML is sufficiently different (idiom, > dialect, what have you) that it deserves a different namespace. Don't fall into this trap. Once we start quantifying differences based on percentages of shared idioms we are into the land of voodoo standardization. We have three grammars. According to Chomsky and "formal languages 201" this means we have three languages. I'll be happy to discard Chomsky (what has he done for me LATELY) if someone comes up with something better. But I won't discard something I can implement in code in favor of "I can't define a dialect but I know it when I see it." I can't code to that and the scary thing is that Microsoft, Oracle and Netscape can't either: so we are opening ourselves up to abuse. "ORAHTML is a *dialect* of HTML so it uses the same namespace. It crashes our competitor's products but that's not our problem." If the defining characteristic of HTML is a single finite grammar then we are safe. When we finish a well-defined extensibility model, we can allow extensibility. Paul Prescod xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format