[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: enumeration and defaults

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 15:18:16 -0700

At 04:05 PM 9/13/99 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>I received two separate replies to my question regarding enumeration and
>defaulting, one from Tim Bray, and one from John Cowan, which he's
>graciously let me post publicly.  They take opposite positions 

I just read both, and I think John's position and mine are completely
coherent.  In John's example:

> <!ATTLIST OL
>                compact (compact) #IMPLIED>
>such as is found in the DTD for XHTML 1.0 Transitional,
>means that either <OL> or <OL compact="compact"> is legal.

if you have <OL>, that means the compact attribute is not specified.
It does *not* mean that it's actually there but with a null value.
I'm pretty sure John would agree. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: enumeration and defaults
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
  • Re: enumeration and defaults
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: enumeration and defaults
• Next by Date: Associating Element Node to Document Node
• Previous by thread: RE: enumeration and defaults
• Next by thread: Re: enumeration and defaults
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread