[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XHTML & Schemas

• From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• To: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>, "XMLDev list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 21:07:49 +0800

> That's well and good, but we can't wait until the XSchema recommendation
is
> finalized. XHTML is due to be finalized much earlier, and as we've seen it
> depends on what the decision in XSchema will be. I don't know how the W3C
> process handles such a conflict. What will happen if XHTML makes a
decision,
> and the XSchema draft then changes so it no longer makes sense?

Which is one reason why I think XHTML should perhaps go with zero namespaces
for now and the W3C should address the broader issue ASAP. Although, it
could be said that the W3C *has* addressed the issue and he has already made
his mind up :-)

James


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XHTML & Schemas
    • From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>

• References:
  • Fw: XHTML & Schemas
    • From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
  • re: XHTML & Schemas
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: XHTML & Schemas
    • From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Next by Date: RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Previous by thread: Re: XHTML & Schemas
• Next by thread: Re: XHTML & Schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread