|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Another look at namespaces
On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > The namespace spec had its work cut out finding a syntax for > declaring and use name prefixes. This is simply not true. The namespace spec had its work cut out to find some form of face-saving phraseology to rubberstamp a syntactic device that external parties had already decided that they kinda sorta liked, and therefore have it they would, and therefore have it they must. In terms of meeting requirements, as they were defined and continually redefined, (I'm reminded of the sage Carvaka's apophthegm "neti, neti, neti" - not this, not this, not this) alternate proposals involving no new syntax were put forward, only to be "rejected" in favor of more and more alleged factors "constraining the solution". Personally, I think publishing the now-defunct XML SIG's archives would afford eye-openers to many people, and quite possibly shorten the debates. At the least, people could see "why" alternate proposals were dismissed, and thus sharpen their insight into what this Namespace maguffin is apparently all about. All IMHO, of course. Arjun xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








