[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Another look at namespaces

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: "XML-DEV" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 16:04:44 -0400 (EDT)

Simon St.Laurent writes:

 > I don't think anyone's argued hard that three flavors of DTDs was a
 > horrible thing, though I know many of us (including, perhaps even Ann)
 > would just as soon reduce it to one.

This is actually an important point -- I have found three flavours of
HTML DTD very useful for authoring (in PSGML), but I have not found or
written any processing tools at all that care about which DTD I
happened to use.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Another look at namespaces
    • From: Walter Underwood <wunder@i...>
  • Re: Another look at namespaces
    • From: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w...>
  • Re: Another look at namespaces
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Another look at namespaces
• Next by Date: RE: Another look at namespaces
• Previous by thread: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread