[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'

• From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
• To: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 13:55:19 -0500

David Megginson wrote:
> 
> Throwing more technology at the problem probably won't help: with
> e-mail, a teleconference, or a face-to-face meeting, it's really the
> moderator who makes it or breaks it (I'm still a mediocre moderator
> myself, but I'm willing to learn).

Using the technology that was designed for precisely this set of 
requirements seems to me to be the best test of that technology and  
the proof of the reasonableness of the requirements. 

len


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
    • From: "Michael Champion" <mike.champion@s...>
  • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
• Next by Date: namespace of attributes?
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
• Next by thread: Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread