[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: an unfilled need

• From: Arjun Ray <aray@q...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 00:55:10 -0400 (EDT)

On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Matthew Gertner wrote:

> No one objected to the W3C controlling XML at the onset because it was
> far from a foregone conclusion that XML was win over a number of
> plausible (but in retrospect clearly inferior) approaches. Now XML is
> mainstream and this no longer flies. 

Actually, the origin of XML as a W3C activity was irregular: it didn't
become an approved activity until Summer '97, at which point the ERB+WG
structure (with a "closed but public" mailing list) was reorganized into
the new WG+SIG (and the mailing list was [expletive deleted] into the Members Area.) 
The original list did make of use of W3C facilities (generously extended),
but my impression is that there was a "wait and see" approach at work, and
XML wasn't really -ahem- assimilated until it had proved itself in the
form of the Nov'96 draft.

> Lack of complete buyin (not to mention open hostility)  from XML
> developers is certainly not in the W3C's interest, and only opens the
> way for Microsoft and other major players to step in with their own
> proprietary (and inevitably less well thought out) approaches.

I would argue that it was in Microsoft et al's *interest* to "close" XML
to the wider community.  How else could they exploit standardization as a
marketing tool?

I'll just point out that namespaces were discussed exhaustively at least
twice on the WG/SIG.  Avaliable to the public is the discussion of
Microsoft's "Structured Data" proposal in May '97: SD5 was about
namespaces.

  <URL:http://lists.w3.org/Archive/Public/w3c-sgml-wg/1997May/>

Very very unfortunately, the discussion preceding the XML Namespaces Draft
was on the new list, which the public can't see.  (Since the SIG has been
dead for a year, the reasons why the archive shouldn't be made public seem
to be political.)


Arjun



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • MSFT is innocent, this time (was Re: an unfilled need)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • Re: an unfilled need
    • From: Matthew Gertner <matthew@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xmlns:html="foo" - a cross-browser solution?
• Next by Date: Who's actually into VML?
• Previous by thread: Re: an unfilled need [ tie XML to Java ]
• Next by thread: MSFT is innocent, this time (was Re: an unfilled need)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread