[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

This is getting silly

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 16:07:30 -0700

All this rumor and innuendo is beside the point.  There is a body of
people called the HTML Working Group who made a set of decisions
reflected in the current XHTML 1.0 WD.  The fact that there were
substantial changes at the last moment is first of all not unprecedented,
secondly not surprising, and thirdly, not the issue here.

There are all sorts of honest grounds for disagreement on namespace
handling in XHTML 1.0, and they are worth investing technical debate in.  
The current wave of postings is just a waste of time.  -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: This is getting silly
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Sample XML datasets for stress testing applications
• Next by Date: Re: My ideal XHTML (if I were dictator)
• Previous by thread: Sample XML datasets for stress testing applications
• Next by thread: Re: This is getting silly
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread