[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: why distinctions within XHTML?

• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 11:05:09 -0700

Ann Navarro wrote:
> 
> While that's certainly a possibility -- before anyone gets too excited
> (either way) over it, the modularization work isn't done, so we may see
> something like this, but we may not.

For the record, some of my feedback back in March to the XHTML work
was that the basics of the modularization stuff should be in the 
first release, since it's that fundamental.  I'd even support holding
back a 1.0 release to ensure modularization is covered.

The current "10% solution" (three namespace URIs) is IMNSHO the wrong
tack -- either don't address it at all, or hold out for a complete
solution, but don't put something in that's widely perceived as broken
and is universally acknowledged as incomplete!

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
    • From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@s...>
  • Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DTDGenerator and empty attributes.
• Next by Date: Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Previous by thread: RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Next by thread: Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread