[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Fw: Fw: XHTML & Schemas

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: "XMLDev list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 09:22:19 -0700

At 10:13 AM 9/2/99 -0400, Ann Navarro wrote:
>Schemas will certainly impact continuing work, but we're not hinging
>anything in XHTML 1.0 on them. 

Er, well, actually, from what you've posted earlier, I thought the
idea that namespaces and schemas map one-to-one was one of the primary
justifications for the use of 3 namespaces in XHTML.

And for the record, I think the idea that namespaces are in an
identity relationship with schemas is just hopelessly broken.  But
that's another debate. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Fw: Fw: XHTML & Schemas
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XHTML & Schemas
• Next by Date: Re: XHTML & Schemas
• Previous by thread: Re: XHTML & Schemas
• Next by thread: Re: Fw: Fw: XHTML & Schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread