[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

re: XHTML and the Three Namespaces

• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 16:08:57 +0100 (BST)

Ann Navarro writes

> The task and constraints given to the group was to bring HTML 4.0 as it
> was, into XML. That doesn't provide for significant design variations like
> moving to a single DTD with conditionals. 

and yet it allows for a significant (and quite possibly fatal) design
variation like introducing multiple namespaces so making xhtml
vastly harder to use with the coming generation of namespace aware tools?

> New and innovative work is continued into future deliverables, working
> drafts currently available to the public. 

But sadly the real danger is that xhtml will be so broken over this
issue that the whole project is derailed. No one wants to see that
happen.

Is it worth risking this just to avoid specifying that HTML versions are
distinguished by the version attribute, rather than by the namespace?


David


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Xml Messaging
• Next by Date: unsuscribe xml-dev
• Previous by thread: RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces
• Next by thread: RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread