[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Another look at namespaces

• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: Marc.McDonald@D..., ricko@a..., xml-dev@i..., timbl@w...
• Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 21:09:05 -0400

At 05:58 PM 9/17/99 -0700, Marc.McDonald@D... wrote:
>
>> At 03:24 PM 9/17/99 -0700, Marc.McDonald@D... wrote:
>> 
>> >. In particular, why should XHTML
>> >go off and decide a mechanism  to solve a problem which is a general XML
>> >problem and is being worked on by the schema group?
>> 
>> We didn't decide someone else's problem. We took a work in progress and
>> used it as the basis of *one* aspect (out of several) for our decision on
>> the namespace issue. 
>> 
>> Ann 
>> 
>> But that is jumping the gun - part of a work in progress  is in a proposed
>> recommendation. 


The key phrase in there is "one aspect"  -- and we're still not *using*
schemas, we're addressing the possibility that this may happen, as well as
dealing with the other use cases described in Steven's message. 

Ann



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Another look at namespaces
    • From: Marc.McDonald@D...

• Prev by Date: RE: Another look at namespaces
• Next by Date: A working alternative to XML Data Binding (An Open Source Release Notice)
• Previous by thread: RE: Another look at namespaces
• Next by thread: RE: Another look at namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread