re: comparison between XML C/C++ parsers?
Michele Lee writes: > I'm trying to decide which XML C/C++ parser to use. Is there any > comparison available? In particular, comparison between IBM4C++ > and expat. Expat is small, fast, and stable -- it's getting a very heavy workout in the Perl community (where it's the standard Perl XML parser), so serious bugs tend to have been chased down, and it seems to operate practically at I/O speed. On the downside, Expat is C rather than C++, so the interface is a little messy -- you might want to put together a C++ wrapper to help avoid nastier bugs. I have no experience yet with IBM4C++, but I do know that they have an interface based on SAX as well as the DOM. It's very new, so expect bugs. All the best, David -- David Megginson david@m... http://www.megginson.com/ xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format