|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
Mark Birbeck wrote: > > 6. There are three variants of HTML 4.0 so we need three variants > of 'HTML 4.0 as XML' (let's call it XHTML). Isn't that assertion pretty core to this debate? That is, it's not a generally accepted assumption. Lots of people think of HTML as _one_ vocabulary, where you'll avoid certain words (some even have four letters :-) to fit into certain subsets (e.g. "strict" ~= "NC-17", "HTML 3.2" ~= "PG-13"). This is the "commonality" argument -- we're striving for common vocabularies and reuse, broadening markets not restricting them, making software general purpose (while allowing specialization in those few cases it's needed). Oh, there's also a major procedural issue too: discussions about technical issues, such as the one above, were discarded by the sudden appearance of a major directional change, one week ago, in a draft called "PR" despite having such a controversial change. That's the whole "W3C isn't being fair with the web community" set of issues -- autocratic behavior clearly on the rise. - Dave xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








