[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Another look at namespaces

• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 08:29:53 -0400

There are two separate issues here. 

#1. In 1999 XHTML can either have three namespaces or one. If it has
three then there will be a one-to-one relationship between namespaces
and grammars so that a programmer can know the grammar of the input
data. Programmers that want to treat the three as one will have to do so
by issuing some command to their namespace processor or (better) by
usuing a namespace processor that recognizes an embedded instruction.

Either way works because programmers know today what to expect and can
write their code accordingly. Hell, we could have one namespace per
element type or one namespace for all W3C specifications and you could
still write code that works.

I think that people are really concerned more about the precedent than
today's issue.

#2. In 2000, 2001, 2002, etc. there will be new versions of XHTML. Some
(probably all) of these will be backwards incompatible as every version
of HTML has been backwards incompatible: a document conforming to the
new vocabular/grammar can break code expecting the old
vocabulary/grammar. 

It is *vital* that a) there be a way to announce this
backwards-incompatibility and b) there be an infrastructure that allows
a mapping from new to old. The namespace is the obvious way to do the
former. We have no good mechanism for the latter.

As I've said, this is also necessary for e-commerce and every other XML
application.

If we develop this mechanism now then the first wave of XHTML software
will be automatically ready for XHTML 2.0 (not to mention e-commerce). I
can understand the wish to delay the problem but it just means that we
cause a train wreck later on. I am deathly afraid, however, that if we
set a precedent of pretending that these three variants are "one
language" we will continue down that path as we develop more and more
incompatible new versions.

 Paul Prescod

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Another look at namespaces
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)]
• Next by Date: RE: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Previous by thread: Text
• Next by thread: RE: Another look at namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread