Re: XML 1.0 spec appears to violate itself
Takuki Kamiya wrote: > > <!ENTITY lt "<"> Yes, that's broken. It's because of the WF-ness constraint that you quoted from 4.3.2, not any other reason. It's the case of a "broken document" ... and in the mode where a conformant processor is not required to report the error. Since that entity value will not be expanded, its WF-ness isn't tested. > Even if we assume "lt" could be redeclared in the internal DTD subset for now > (I guess we can even extrapolate this is the case since the spec itself > redeclares it) ... It's clear that it _is_ permitted to redeclare entities (including the predeclared ones) in the internal subset. See section 4.6 where it talks about various "may" (may redeclare) and "must" (must still be WF, and not change the standard effect) cases, none of which could work if such redeclaration were disallowed. > I think that XML processor shall find the entity as "not well-formed" when it > tries to expand references to "lt" (i.e. < ) if it have been redeclared > as "<", because "<" does not match the production rule for content. > > Am I missing something? Only that, as Richard implied, most XML processors treat those entities as "predefined" and so any additional declarations are often ignored. That's permitted; the spec says a warning "may" be issued, but they're not required. - Dave xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format