[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: More CDATA questions

• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 11:36:50 -0700

John Cowan wrote:
> 
> roddey@u... wrote:
> 
> > Would, for instance, it always be considered characters because its
> > not just 'accidental whitespace'?
> 
> Yes, indeed.  Element content models allow only ordinary whitespace,
> not CDATA-bracketed whitespace.  Therefore, nothing can be both
> "ignorable whitespace" and CDATA-bracketed at the same time.
> 
> Clause 3.2.1 makes it clear that whitespace in element-content-model
> elements must match the production S, which a CDATA section does not.

Doesn't make it clear to me!  :-)

2.7 sez "CDATA sections may occur anywhere character data may occur",
and in 2.3 there is no restriction that it not appear within a CDATA
section.  QED; and a variety of other arguments conclude the same.

For a few historical perspectives (and John, I noticed we have
both maintained consistent positions on this issue :-) see:

 http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/xml-dev-Oct-1998/0536.html
 http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/xml-dev-Oct-1998/0541.html
 http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/xml-dev-Nov-1998/0000.html
 http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/xml-dev-Nov-1998/0001.html

And similar posts, mostly that in October 1998; the issue summarizes
(IMHO) as a minor lack of clarity in how CDATA shows up.

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • More CDATA questions
    • From: roddey@u...
  • Re: More CDATA questions
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Top-down or bottom-up?
• Next by Date: Content Negotiation not enough for schemas (was Re: Namespace URI address resources)
• Previous by thread: Re: More CDATA questions
• Next by thread: supporting unicode in XML tools
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread