[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Inline markup considered harmful?

• From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• To: "Miles Sabin" <msabin@c...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 15:05:14 +0800

> I would be very interested in any references to this
> (or related) work that might me lying around.

I spoke on this at SGML/XML Asia Pacific last year, taking Ted Nelson's
article in the W3J as my starting point. I showed how XLink/XPointers could
be used to achieve "parallel" markup then went on to discuss more
philosophical issues relating to what assertions one is actually making when
they mark up documents, arriving at the conclusion that the distinction
between markup, content and presentation is a blurred, application-specific
one (presentation is just another markup language, as is content).

James


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Inline markup considered harmful?
    • From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Next by Date: RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Previous by thread: RE: Inline markup considered harmful?
• Next by thread: RE: Inline markup considered harmful?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread