[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX2: Namespaces and syntax of compound names

• From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• To: XML Developers' List <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 17:25:01 +0200

i would actually prefer to have the option requesting that names be parsed to
interned symbols. symbols without uri are simply in a package either without a
name, or with a constant default name.
this mechanism also offers numerous advantages. for example, giving the
package more than one name, or constructing and using packages
programmatically while delaying binding to the uri. a consequence of which is
that it would be trivial to shifting the uri systematically for compiled applications...
 
David Megginson wrote:
> 
> I have just heard a good argument for using the
> 
>   "{URIpart}localpart"
> 
> syntax for compound names rather than the
> 
>   "URIpart localpart"
> 
> ...  What does everyone else think?
>


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • SAX2: Namespaces and syntax of compound names
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSL Debate, Leventhal responds to Stephen Deach
• Next by Date: Re: XSL Debate, Leventhal responds to Stephen Deach
• Previous by thread: SAX2: Namespaces and syntax of compound names
• Next by thread: Re: SAX2: Namespaces and syntax of compound names
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread