[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Validation and Parser Bloat (was: Re: parsers for Palm?)

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 14:22:48 -0400 (EDT)

Tim Bray writes:

 > Distinguish between <!DOCTYPE > and validation.  I do *not* agree
 > that parsing DTD syntax takes up 2/3 of a parser.  On the other hand,
 > it's reasonable to expect a validating parser to be twice the size
 > of a non-validating one.  Note that nearly all the existing 
 > validating parsers parse DTD syntax just fine. -T.

>From my hazy recollection, parsing everything inside <!DOCTYPE> added
about 10% to AElfred's size, and that included keeping information
from the declarations (but not validation per se).  The biggest size
bloat -- at least 30% -- came from having to work around inefficient
Java library classes by adding custom buffering and hash-table
routines.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: parsers for Palm?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DDML Section 2.3.7: Nested SEQs within SEQ
• Next by Date: Re: parsers for Palm?
• Previous by thread: Re: parsers for Palm?
• Next by thread: Re: parsers for Palm?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread