[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSL Debate, Leventhal responds to Stephen Deach

• From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 12:59:03 +0800

>But XSL has a transformation language, so presumably it is transforming
>from a more abstract kind of markup.  Are you saying that is it always
>wrong to make data available in formatting markup? That would be a >strange
thing for the developer of FOP.


Perhaps the developer of FOP *is* strange.

James


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: Namespace URI address resources
• Next by Date: RE: X-Schema
• Previous by thread: Java/XML/open source programmers wanted Fairfax VA
• Next by thread: Re: Specifying numbers as attribute values
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread