[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

re: Storing Application State as XML

• From: "Steve Kearon" <stevek@f...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:31:42 +0100

I wrote:

>>We went through the same process as you: having used MFC serlialization,
XML
>>sounded like it had various advantages.

on 1999-06-21, roddey@u... wrote:

>Isn't this what the W3C XMI spec is at least partially about? Or am I
mixing
>acronyms here? Sorry if someone else already made this point, the all new
mondo
>weekly archive posting is too big to go look around too much.

I'm not too familiar with XMI (hence the pause before replying, in the vain
hope that someone else would step in, and allow me to say "yeah, I knew
that").

I *think* XMI is for transfering designs (metadata) between modelling
systems - eg a common format for UML designs.

Steve



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: re: storing application state as XML
• Next by Date: Re: Storing application state as XML
• Previous by thread: re: storing application state as XML
• Next by thread: Re: Building the "World's Largest Portal" with XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread