|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Inline markup considered harmful? (was RE: question for a friend)
Richard Tobin writes:
> Another solution, for some purposes, is to have two documents, one for
> each hierarchy. Of course, you don't want to to duplicate the data
> itself. We avoid this by using "standoff markup", which we implement
> with XLinks (we have our own software to perform the transclusion
> process).
Way back in the 1980's, about 40 Internet years ago, the computer part
Oxford English Dictionary project at the University of Waterloo
(Ontario) published a short monograph on this issue. I no longer have
my copy, and remember neither the title nor author, but the premise
was that inline markup like SGML should be considered harmful, and
that out-of-line markup was much more flexible (since you can apply
more than one hierarchy to the same content).
Tim Bray knows the OED people much better than I do, and he might be
able to provide more useful details and/or correct my possibly-faulty
recollection of the thesis.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@m...
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








