[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: X-Schema

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 08:34:22 -0400 (EDT)

Paul Prescod writes:

 > I am genuinely interested in improving XML usability, however, so I
 > would like to hear counter-arguments.

In my opinion, the best counter argument is that you can include
structured documentation as part of the schema itself.  In a DTD, an
awful lot of useful information is stashed away in comments, and has
to be copied into documentation using cut-and-paste.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: X-Schema
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • RE: X-Schema
    • From: "Steven Livingstone" <s.livingstone@b...>
  • Re: X-Schema
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespace URI address resources
• Next by Date: Re: Top-down or bottom-up?
• Previous by thread: Re: X-Schema
• Next by thread: Re: X-Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread