[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)

• From: "WorldNet" <csgallagher@w...>
• To: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>,"XML List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 12:43:45 -0500

> The idea is that a namespace identifier just needs to be a unique
> differentiate among element and attribute names that otherwise might be
> identical across various XML applications.

Okay, two or more documents interacting with one another
are determined to have exact element and or attribute names so the
namespace identifier then acts as a differentiator. What next?
Meaning, I thought namespaces were going to be like libraries
of contextual data definitions?

>The URI scheme has been
> suggested as a familiar way to accomplish this. I still haven't made up my
> own mind about it, but (to me) its chief flaw is that it *suggests* to a
> namespace-unaware human reader that There Is a "There" There.

And I've become such an 'Accidental Tourist'.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
    • From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>

• References:
  • RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
    • From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Next by Date: RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Previous by thread: RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Next by thread: RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread