[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Are Namespace URLs illegal?

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 14:33:43 -0400 (EDT)

Paul Prescod writes:

 > Well, the first problem is that it is wrong: it is in violation of
 > IETF specifications about the semantics of http: URLs. Personally,
 > I think that standards incompliance should be argument enough.

Paul is begging the question here -- it needs to be proven that the
use of URLs for Namespace URIs violates any standards, so it is not
fair to jump ahead as if the first point were already proven.  

Personally, I'd guess that since the IETF spec governs the use of URLs
only for retrieving resources over the Internet, and Namespaces are a
different use domain, the IETF specs are applicable only to the extent
that the Namespaces REC says they are.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Paul has volunteered (was Re: Overloaded URIs must GO!)
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>
  • Re: Paul has volunteered (was Re: Overloaded URIs must GO!)
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Just require URLs
• Next by Date: RE: Just require URLs
• Previous by thread: Re: Paul has volunteered (was Re: Overloaded URIs must GO!)
• Next by thread: RE: Paul has volunteered (was Re: Overloaded URIs must GO!)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread