Re: SAX2 and XSLT processors
Oren Ben-Kiki writes: >Is there a reason for this selection - that is, can you define the >xml.org "turf" such a way that given a spec for something we'd know >in advance whether it belongs in the SAX2 "core" or not? Support for a spec other than XML belongs in the core if there are many existing dependencies on it. Namespaces, for example, are very closely coupled with XML 1.0, and many other specs and implementations build on top of XML+Namespaces rather than just on XML, including RDF (and PICS, etc.), XHTML, and XSL; other specs, such as XML Schemas, Infoset, and DOM, either support or are soon to support Namespaces. All the best, David -- David Megginson david@m... http://www.megginson.com/ xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format