[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Lotsa laughs

• From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>
• To: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 16:44:05 +0200

John Cowan wrote:
> 
> James Clark wrote:
> 
> > This is in conformance with the W3C Character Model WD. See
> 
> More specifically, it conforms to the HTML 4.0 recommendation
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/appendix/notes.html#h-B.2) which
> recommends that user agents should fix up URLs containing
> illegal characters.

Thanks, I had forgotten that HTML 4.0 already did that; in which case
IE5 is correctly carrying out error recovery, in accordance with the
HTML 4.0 spec, on an illegal URL.

As Appendix B2 makes clear, the actual URL is still illegal; and the
document is still wrong; and could be trivially fixed by url encoding
the invalid bytes, having first converted the characters to bytes in
UTF-8.
 
> Nevertheless, it is an embarrassment that such a site exports
> illegal HTML.

Well, yes. 

--
Chris

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Lotsa laughs
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Lotsa laughs
    • From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>
  • Re: Lotsa laughs
    • From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>
  • Re: Lotsa laughs
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: Lotsa laughs
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Lotsa laughs
• Next by Date: Standards (was RE: Lotsa laughs)
• Previous by thread: Re: Lotsa laughs
• Next by thread: Re: Lotsa laughs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread